refactor(ingress): 信箱边界层契约重构——发现与处理标记解耦、回填事实并入 PROC_STATE

收报扫描不再以 DATE_PROCESSED 为谓词:终态而未回填的行(解码失败死信等)会永久占据
有限批次,累积到 claim-batch 后收报整体停摆(US-01 条目 3 / message-lifecycle §5.3)。

ingress/InboxPoller.kt:按 ID 区间升序有界读取(ID > W),水位落 INBOX_CURSOR 并与入队
同一 PG 事务推进(中断后重扫补建);遇空洞即停,空洞超过 pipeline.max-commit-delay 判定
为永久并放行——否则水位永久停摆于一次自增回滚留下的空位。删除 InboxEnqueue(改由
insertIfAbsent 幂等入队)与 poller 内的回填扫描(消除 ingress→jobs 反向依赖)。

infra/persistence:端口按事实重画为 readRange/maxId/markProcessedIfUnmarked,标记 UPDATE
带 DATE_PROCESSED IS NULL 守卫,只把空标写为已处理(§11 单调,重复执行无副作用)。
回填事实并入 PROC_STATE(RECEIVED_AT/BACKFILL_AT/NEXT_AT/ATTEMPTS/ERROR),BACKFILL_TODO
随 V2 迁移下线;终态与回填意图是同一条 UPDATE,由处理器在自己的业务事务内落库,
message-lifecycle §4 登记的两个崩溃窗口(提交后回填前崩溃、待办二次落账失败)不再是缺口。

processing/BackfillService.kt(取代 BackfillSweepJob):终态提交后立即尝试一次,失败按
30s→15min 指数退避重试;扫描条件「终态 + 未确认标记 +(已到期 或 接收时间早于 NOW − R)」
使 §5.2 的超期期限 R 覆盖退避,中间态永不补写。死信同样可补写——回填只需消息 ID,
不再依赖 META。Pump 改用可注入 Clock。

infra/health:InboxLifecycleHealthIndicator 输出积压条数、最老未处理信龄、未回填终态数与
水位滞后(OPS-2 / §5.3 验收)。预计消化时长需吞吐采样,留待接入指标注册表时补。

配置:pipeline.max-commit-delay / overdue-backfill / backfill-batch、mailbox.processed-value
(Q2/Q6/Q7 未书面确认前取保守初值,不得为提速下调)。

不变量回归测试:死信不阻断后续发现、水位遇空洞即停与老化放行、终态+意图同事务、
超期 R 覆盖退避、中间态不补写、标记单调;InboxLifecycleJdbcSqlTest 以 H2 的 PostgreSQL
兼容模式直连验证上述 SQL 语义(不依赖 docker)。libs.h2 由 testRuntimeOnly 提为
testImplementation 以支持该用例。

验证:gradle clean test --offline → 78 tests / 0 failures / 1 skipped
(PG Testcontainers 集成用例在本机无 docker 时按既有约定 assumeTrue 跳过)。
This commit is contained in:
windyboy
2026-09-10 10:59:58 +08:00
parent ffd3abd655
commit 09b53c77bb
32 changed files with 1402 additions and 548 deletions
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ class PipelineSmokeTest {
fun cleanStubs() {
ctx.getBean(StubProcState::class.java).clear()
ctx.getBean(com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubInbox::class.java).clear()
ctx.getBean(com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubInboxCursor::class.java).clear()
ctx.getBean(StubMsgEvents::class.java).clear()
ctx.getBean(StubDeliveryPort::class.java).clear()
}
@@ -100,6 +101,30 @@ class PipelineSmokeTest {
assertEquals(0, reopened.attempts)
}
/**
* 回归(message-lifecycle §5.2/§5.3):死信到达终态时同时登记回填意图并立即回填——
* 否则永不回填的行会永久占据发现窗口,累积到批大小后收报整体停摆。
*/
@Test
fun `dead letter reaches terminal state, gets marked and cannot block later discovery`() {
val inbox = ctx.getBean(com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubInbox::class.java)
val proc = ctx.getBean(StubProcState::class.java)
val dead = inbox.simulateExternalWrite("<MSG/>")
ctx.getBean(com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.ingress.InboxPoller::class.java).pollOnce()
pump.tick() // 解码 MALFORMED → DEAD + 回填意图(同一条 UPDATE)→ 提交后立即回填
val row = proc.find(dead)!!
assertEquals(ProcStatus.DEAD, row.state)
assertEquals(ErrorClass.MALFORMED, row.errorClass)
assertNotNull(row.backfillAt)
assertTrue(inbox.isMarked(dead))
val fresh = inbox.simulateExternalWrite("<MSG/>")
ctx.getBean(com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.ingress.InboxPoller::class.java).pollOnce()
assertNotNull(proc.find(fresh)) // 死信不阻断后续发现
}
@Test
fun `dispatcher flushes schd batch through stub port`() {
val events = ctx.getBean(StubMsgEvents::class.java)
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
package com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.health
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.MutableClock
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.delivery.DeliveryPort
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.ProcStatus
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.InboxCursorRepository
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubInbox
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubInboxCursor
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubProcState
import io.micronaut.health.HealthStatus
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test
@@ -32,4 +38,35 @@ class HealthIndicatorsTest {
assertEquals(HealthStatus.DOWN, kafkaHealth(ThrowingPort()).status)
assertEquals(HealthStatus.DOWN, kafkaHealth(null).status) // bean 缺失
}
/** OPS-2message-lifecycle §5.3):积压、最老未处理信龄、未回填终态与水位滞后。 */
@Test
fun `inbox lifecycle reports backlog, oldest age, unmarked terminals and watermark lag`() {
val proc = StubProcState()
val inbox = StubInbox().apply { clear() }
val cursor = StubInboxCursor()
val oldest = MutableClock.BASE.minusSeconds(3600)
proc.insertIfAbsent(1L, oldest)
proc.insertIfAbsent(2L, MutableClock.BASE)
proc.markTerminal(2L, ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED)
val newest = inbox.insertRaw("<MSG/>")
cursor.save(InboxCursorRepository.Cursor(committedUpTo = newest - 2))
val result = lifecycleHealth(proc, cursor, inbox, now = MutableClock.BASE)
assertEquals(HealthStatus.UP, result.status)
@Suppress("UNCHECKED_CAST")
val details = result.details as Map<String, Any>
assertEquals(1, details["backlog"])
assertEquals(3600L, details["oldestUnprocessedSeconds"])
assertEquals(1, details["unmarkedTerminal"])
assertEquals(2L, details["watermarkLag"])
}
@Test
fun `inbox lifecycle stays up when ports are not bound`() {
val result = lifecycleHealth(procState = null, cursor = null, mailbox = null)
assertEquals(HealthStatus.UP, result.status) // 可用性由依赖自身指示器承担
}
}
@@ -9,10 +9,12 @@ import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test
import java.sql.DriverManager
/**
* Flyway 迁移引擎端到端验证(docs/flight-state.md §2 权威模型 + design.md §2.1):
* 1. V1__flight_state_baseline.sql 在真实 PostgreSQL 上自动迁移成功;
* Flyway 迁移引擎端到端验证(docs/flight-state.md §2 权威模型 + design.md §2.1 +
* message-lifecycle.md §5.1/§5.2):
* 1. V1 基线 + V2 信箱生命周期迁移在真实 PostgreSQL 上自动成功;
* 2. flyway_schema_history 落库且 success = true
* 3. 决策层/管道层/留痕层全表就绪;PIPELINE_LOCK 单行种子就位
* 3. 决策层/管道层/留痕层全表就绪;PIPELINE_LOCK 与 INBOX_CURSOR 单行种子就位
* 4. V2 收敛结果成立:回填事实并入 PROC_STATEBACKFILL_TODO 下线。
*/
class FlywayMigrationTest {
@@ -20,11 +22,11 @@ class FlywayMigrationTest {
"pipeline_lock", "proc_state", "flight_schd",
"flight_gate", "flight_checkin", "flight_belt", "flight_stand_plan", "flight_chute",
"flight_delay", "flight_bridge_op", "flight_chock_op", "flight_route_point",
"msg_event", "req_track", "backfill_todo", "schd_snap_log",
"msg_event", "req_track", "inbox_cursor", "schd_snap_log",
)
@Test
fun `Flyway migrates flight-state baseline onto real PostgreSQL`() {
fun `Flyway migrates flight-state baseline and inbox lifecycle onto real PostgreSQL`() {
assumeTrue(PgTestSupport.canConnect(), PgTestSupport.skipMessage())
val url = PgTestSupport.jdbcUrl
val user = PgTestSupport.user
@@ -39,7 +41,7 @@ class FlywayMigrationTest {
DriverManager.getConnection(url, user, pass).use { conn ->
conn.createStatement().use { stmt ->
// 迁移记录:单基线 V1
// 迁移记录:V1 基线 + V2 信箱生命周期
stmt.executeQuery(
"SELECT version, script, success FROM flyway_schema_history ORDER BY installed_rank ASC",
).use { rs ->
@@ -47,13 +49,15 @@ class FlywayMigrationTest {
while (rs.next()) {
records.add(Triple(rs.getString("version"), rs.getString("script"), rs.getBoolean("success")))
}
assertTrue(records.isNotEmpty(), "flyway_schema_history must record migrations")
assertTrue(records.size >= 2, "flyway_schema_history must record both migrations")
assertEquals("1", records[0].first)
assertEquals("V1__flight_state_baseline.sql", records[0].second)
assertTrue(records[0].third)
assertEquals("2", records[1].first)
assertEquals("V2__inbox_lifecycle.sql", records[1].second)
assertTrue(records.all { it.third })
}
// §3.2 全表就绪
// 全表就绪V2 后 backfill_todo 下线)
stmt.executeQuery(
"SELECT table_name FROM information_schema.tables WHERE table_schema = 'public'",
).use { rs ->
@@ -61,6 +65,7 @@ class FlywayMigrationTest {
while (rs.next()) tables.add(rs.getString("table_name"))
val missing = expectedTables - tables
assertTrue(missing.isEmpty(), "missing tables: $missing")
assertTrue("backfill_todo" !in tables, "BACKFILL_TODO 已由 PROC_STATE 回填列取代")
}
// 身份不变量基础结构:FLIGHT_SCHD 主键 + STATE 列
@@ -73,11 +78,31 @@ class FlywayMigrationTest {
assertEquals(setOf("flid", "operation_day", "state", "state_version", "last_msg_id"), cols)
}
// PIPELINE_LOCK 单行种子(§3.2
// 回填事实并入 PROC_STATE(§5.2 判据 + 回填待办
stmt.executeQuery(
"SELECT column_name FROM information_schema.columns WHERE table_name = 'proc_state' " +
"AND column_name IN ('received_at', 'backfill_at', 'backfill_next_at', " +
"'backfill_attempts', 'backfill_error')",
).use { rs ->
val cols = mutableSetOf<String>()
while (rs.next()) cols.add(rs.getString("column_name"))
assertEquals(
setOf("received_at", "backfill_at", "backfill_next_at", "backfill_attempts", "backfill_error"),
cols,
)
}
// PIPELINE_LOCK 与 INBOX_CURSOR 单行种子(§3.2 / §5.1
stmt.executeQuery("SELECT count(*) FROM pipeline_lock WHERE lock_id = 1").use { rs ->
assertTrue(rs.next())
assertEquals(1, rs.getInt(1))
}
stmt.executeQuery("SELECT committed_up_to, hole_since FROM inbox_cursor WHERE cursor_id = 1").use { rs ->
assertTrue(rs.next(), "INBOX_CURSOR 单行种子必须就位")
assertEquals(0L, rs.getLong("committed_up_to"))
rs.getTimestamp("hole_since")
assertTrue(rs.wasNull(), "初始无空洞观测")
}
}
}
}
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
package com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.jdbc
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.ErrorClass
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.ProcStatus
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.InboxCursorRepository
import org.h2.jdbcx.JdbcDataSource
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertFalse
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNotNull
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNull
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue
import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test
import java.sql.Connection
import java.sql.Timestamp
import java.time.Duration
import java.time.Instant
import java.util.UUID
import javax.sql.DataSource
/**
* 信箱生命周期 SQL 语义(message-lifecycle §4/§5.1/§5.2/§11)在真实 JDBC 上的验证。
* 以 H2 的 PostgreSQL 兼容模式承载与 V1+V2 等价的表结构——不依赖 docker/外接库,
* 覆盖 PG 侧(终态与回填意图同体、到期/超期筛选、积压观测、水位游标)与 MySQL 侧
* (区间发现、标记单调)的实际语句行为。
*
* 说明:H2 不支持 `INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING`
* [JdbcProcStateRepository.insertIfAbsent] 的入队幂等由 PG 语义与
* `InboxPollerTest`(重复轮询不再入队)分别保证。
*/
class InboxLifecycleJdbcSqlTest {
private lateinit var ds: DataSource
private lateinit var proc: JdbcProcStateRepository
private lateinit var mailbox: JdbcCminmsgInboxRepository
private lateinit var cursor: JdbcInboxCursorRepository
private val t0: Instant = Instant.parse("2026-09-08T03:00:00Z")
private val overdue: Instant = t0.minus(Duration.ofDays(31))
@BeforeEach
fun setUp() {
ds = JdbcDataSource().apply {
setURL("jdbc:h2:mem:inbox-${UUID.randomUUID()};DB_CLOSE_DELAY=-1;MODE=PostgreSQL")
setUser("sa")
setPassword("")
}
ds.connection.use { conn ->
conn.createStatement().use { st ->
st.execute(PROC_STATE_DDL)
st.execute(CURSOR_DDL)
st.execute(MAILBOX_DDL)
st.execute(
"INSERT INTO inbox_cursor (cursor_id, committed_up_to, hole_since, updated_at) " +
"VALUES (1, 0, NULL, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP)",
)
}
}
proc = JdbcProcStateRepository(ds)
mailbox = JdbcCminmsgInboxRepository(ds)
cursor = JdbcInboxCursorRepository(ds)
}
@Test
fun `terminal write carries the backfill intent in the same statement`() {
seed(11L, t0)
proc.markTerminal(11L, ProcStatus.DEAD, errorClass = ErrorClass.MALFORMED, lastError = "raw-missing", now = t0)
val row = proc.find(11L)!!
assertEquals(ProcStatus.DEAD, row.state)
assertEquals(ErrorClass.MALFORMED, row.errorClass)
assertEquals(t0, row.backfillNextAt) // 终态与回填意图同一条 UPDATE(§2/§4)
assertNull(row.backfillAt)
assertEquals(t0, row.receivedAt)
}
@Test
fun `backfill failure is recorded on the same row without touching the terminal state`() {
seed(11L, t0)
proc.markTerminal(11L, ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED, now = t0)
proc.recordBackfillFailure(11L, "mysql-down", attempts = 2, nextAttemptAt = t0.plusSeconds(120), now = t0)
val row = proc.find(11L)!!
assertEquals(ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED, row.state) // §11 终态不可逆
assertEquals(2, row.backfillAttempts)
assertEquals(t0.plusSeconds(120), row.backfillNextAt)
assertEquals("mysql-down", row.backfillError)
}
@Test
fun `due query honours due time, the overdue deadline and terminal-only filter`() {
// ① 到期
seed(1L, t0)
proc.markTerminal(1L, ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED, now = t0)
// ② 未到期(退避推后)
seed(2L, t0)
proc.markTerminal(2L, ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED, now = t0)
proc.recordBackfillFailure(2L, "mysql-down", 1, t0.plus(Duration.ofMinutes(15)), t0)
// ③ 未到期但接收时间已达超期期限 R(§5.2 覆盖退避)
seed(3L, overdue)
proc.markTerminal(3L, ProcStatus.DEAD, errorClass = ErrorClass.MALFORMED, now = t0)
proc.recordBackfillFailure(3L, "mysql-down", 1, t0.plus(Duration.ofMinutes(15)), t0)
// ④ 中间态:永不补写(§5.2)
seed(4L, overdue)
// ⑤ 已确认标记
seed(5L, t0)
proc.markTerminal(5L, ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED, now = t0)
proc.markBackfilled(5L, t0)
val due = proc.findBackfillDue(t0, t0.minus(Duration.ofDays(30)), limit = 100).map { it.msgId }
assertEquals(listOf(1L, 3L), due)
assertEquals(listOf(1L), proc.findBackfillDue(t0, t0.minus(Duration.ofDays(30)), limit = 1).map { it.msgId })
}
@Test
fun `backlog reports unfinished messages, oldest receive time and unmarked terminals`() {
seed(1L, overdue)
seed(2L, t0)
proc.markTerminal(2L, ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED, now = t0)
val backlog = proc.backlog()
assertEquals(1, backlog.unfinished)
assertEquals(overdue, backlog.oldestReceivedAt) // OPS-2 最老未处理信龄锚点
assertEquals(1, backlog.unmarkedTerminal)
}
@Test
fun `watermark round trips with and without a pending hole`() {
assertEquals(InboxCursorRepository.Cursor(0L, null), cursor.load())
cursor.save(InboxCursorRepository.Cursor(42L, t0))
assertEquals(InboxCursorRepository.Cursor(42L, t0), cursor.load())
}
@Test
fun `mailbox range read ignores processing marks and marking never overwrites`() {
val first = mailbox.insertRaw("<A/>")
val second = mailbox.insertRaw("<B/>")
val third = mailbox.insertRaw("<C/>")
// 发现按 ID 区间;处理标记不参与扫描谓词
assertEquals(listOf(first, second, third), mailbox.readRange(0L, 50).map { it.msgId })
assertNotNull(mailbox.readRange(0L, 50).first().receivedAt)
assertEquals(listOf(second, third), mailbox.readRange(first, 50).map { it.msgId })
assertEquals(third, mailbox.maxId())
assertTrue(mailbox.markProcessedIfUnmarked(second, "PROCESSED"))
assertFalse(mailbox.markProcessedIfUnmarked(second, "OTHER")) // §11 只把空标写为已处理
assertEquals("PROCESSED", statusOf(second))
// 已标记行仍出现在区间读结果中(发现与标记彻底解耦)
assertEquals(listOf(first, second, third), mailbox.readRange(0L, 50).map { it.msgId })
assertFalse(mailbox.markProcessedIfUnmarked(999L, "PROCESSED"))
}
private fun seed(msgId: Long, receivedAt: Instant?, state: ProcStatus = ProcStatus.PENDING) {
ds.connection.use { conn: Connection ->
conn.prepareStatement(
"INSERT INTO proc_state (msg_id, state, received_at, backfill_attempts, updated_at) VALUES (?, ?, ?, 0, ?)",
).use { ps ->
ps.setLong(1, msgId)
ps.setString(2, state.name)
ps.setTimestamp(3, receivedAt?.let { Timestamp.from(it) })
ps.setTimestamp(4, Timestamp.from(t0))
ps.executeUpdate()
}
}
}
private fun statusOf(msgId: Long): String? =
ds.connection.use { conn: Connection ->
conn.prepareStatement("SELECT CMINMSGS_STATUS FROM cminmsgs WHERE CMINMSGS_ID = ?").use { ps ->
ps.setLong(1, msgId)
ps.executeQuery().use { rs -> if (rs.next()) rs.getString(1) else null }
}
}
private companion object {
const val PROC_STATE_DDL = """
CREATE TABLE proc_state (
msg_id BIGINT PRIMARY KEY,
state VARCHAR(16) NOT NULL,
identity_key VARCHAR(200),
attempts INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
next_attempt_at TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE,
error_class VARCHAR(20),
last_error VARCHAR(1000),
received_at TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE,
backfill_at TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE,
backfill_next_at TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE,
backfill_attempts INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
backfill_error VARCHAR(512),
updated_at TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT uk_proc_identity UNIQUE (identity_key)
)
"""
const val CURSOR_DDL = """
CREATE TABLE inbox_cursor (
cursor_id INT PRIMARY KEY,
committed_up_to BIGINT NOT NULL,
hole_since TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE,
updated_at TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE NOT NULL
)
"""
const val MAILBOX_DDL = """
CREATE TABLE cminmsgs (
CMINMSGS_ID BIGINT GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY,
CMINMSGS_CLOB_MSG CLOB,
CMINMSGS_DATE_RECEIVED TIMESTAMP,
CMINMSGS_DATE_PROCESSED TIMESTAMP,
CMINMSGS_STATUS VARCHAR(32)
)
"""
}
}
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ class ReplayServiceTest {
rows[id] = ProcState(id, status, identityKey = "k$id", attempts = 3, errorClass = ec, lastError = "x")
}
override fun insert(msgId: Long, state: ProcStatus) = Unit
override fun exists(msgId: Long): Boolean = rows.containsKey(msgId)
override fun insertIfAbsent(msgId: Long, receivedAt: Instant?): Boolean = rows.putIfAbsent(msgId, ProcState(msgId, ProcStatus.PENDING, receivedAt = receivedAt)) == null
override fun find(msgId: Long): ProcState? = rows[msgId]
override fun findSuccessTerminal(msgId: Long): Boolean = rows[msgId]?.state == ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED
override fun headUnfinished(): ProcState? = null
@@ -35,6 +34,20 @@ class ReplayServiceTest {
errorClass: ErrorClass?, lastError: String?,
) = Unit
override fun markTerminal(
msgId: Long, state: ProcStatus, errorClass: ErrorClass?, lastError: String?,
attempts: Int?, now: Instant,
) = Unit
override fun markBackfilled(msgId: Long, now: Instant) = Unit
override fun recordBackfillFailure(msgId: Long, error: String?, attempts: Int, nextAttemptAt: Instant, now: Instant) = Unit
override fun findBackfillDue(now: Instant, overdueBefore: Instant, limit: Int) =
emptyList<com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.BackfillDue>()
override fun backlog() = com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.Backlog(0, null, 0)
override fun requeueByErrorClasses(errorClasses: List<ErrorClass>): Int {
requeueCalls += errorClasses
var n = 0
@@ -1,47 +1,120 @@
package com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.ingress
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.config.PipelineProps
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.ErrorClass
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.ProcStatus
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubInbox
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubInboxCursor
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubPipelineTx
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubProcState
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.processing.Pump
import io.micronaut.test.extensions.junit5.annotation.MicronautTest
import jakarta.inject.Inject
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertFalse
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNotNull
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNull
import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test
import java.time.Instant
/** 主路径:JDBC 轮询语义(stub 下 InboxPoller + 外部写信箱模拟)。 */
@MicronautTest
/**
* 收报发现权不变量(docs/message-lifecycle.md §5.1/§5.3 + architecture.md §5 严格 FIFO):
* - 扫描按 ID 区间,**不受处理标记影响**:终态而未回填的行不得占据批次、不得阻断新信发现;
* - 水位只随成功入队推进,且与入队同事务(中断后由重扫补建);
* - 遇空洞即停(较小 ID 未入队时不得被后续消息越过);空洞老化后放行(水位不得永久停摆);
* - 收报层不写处理标记。
*/
class InboxPollerTest {
@Inject lateinit var poller: InboxPoller
@Inject lateinit var pump: Pump
@Inject lateinit var stubInbox: StubInbox
@Inject lateinit var stubProc: StubProcState
private val t0: Instant = Instant.parse("2026-09-08T03:00:00Z")
private val props = PipelineProps()
private lateinit var inbox: StubInbox
private lateinit var proc: StubProcState
private lateinit var cursor: StubInboxCursor
private lateinit var poller: InboxPoller
@BeforeEach
fun clean() {
stubInbox.clear()
stubProc.clear()
fun setUp() {
inbox = StubInbox().apply { clear() }
proc = StubProcState().apply { clear() }
cursor = StubInboxCursor().apply { clear() }
poller = InboxPoller(inbox, proc, cursor, StubPipelineTx(), props)
}
@Test
fun `poller enqueues externally written mailbox rows`() {
val id = stubInbox.simulateExternalWrite("<MSG/>")
assertEquals(1, poller.pollOnce())
assertNotNull(stubProc.snapshotOf(id))
assertEquals(ProcStatus.PENDING, stubProc.snapshotOf(id)!!.state)
fun `external rows are enqueued in id order and advance the watermark without marking the mailbox`() {
val first = inbox.simulateExternalWrite("<MSG/>")
val second = inbox.simulateExternalWrite("<MSG/>")
assertEquals(2, poller.pollOnce(t0))
assertEquals(ProcStatus.PENDING, proc.find(first)!!.state)
assertEquals(ProcStatus.PENDING, proc.find(second)!!.state)
assertEquals(second, cursor.cursor.committedUpTo)
assertNull(cursor.cursor.holeSince)
// §5.3:消化阶段只写自有 PG,不触碰信箱标记
assertFalse(inbox.isMarked(first))
assertEquals(0, poller.pollOnce(t0)) // 重复扫描幂等
}
/**
* 回归(US-01 条目 3 / §5.3「积压挡批」):终态且永不回填的行(解码失败死信等)曾占满
* 有限批次使收报整体停摆——发现必须与处理标记彻底解耦。
*/
@Test
fun `terminal rows without a mailbox mark do not block discovery of later messages`() {
props.pipeline.claimBatch = 3
val dead = (1..3).map { inbox.simulateExternalWrite("<MSG/>") }
assertEquals(3, poller.pollOnce(t0))
dead.forEach {
proc.markTerminal(it, ProcStatus.DEAD, errorClass = ErrorClass.MALFORMED, lastError = "raw-missing")
}
val fresh = inbox.simulateExternalWrite("<MSG/>")
assertEquals(1, poller.pollOnce(t0))
assertEquals(ProcStatus.PENDING, proc.find(fresh)!!.state)
assertEquals(fresh, cursor.cursor.committedUpTo)
}
@Test
fun `poller is idempotent for already enqueued rows`() {
val id = stubInbox.simulateExternalWrite("<MSG/>")
poller.pollOnce()
assertEquals(0, poller.pollOnce())
pump.tick()
assertEquals(ProcStatus.DEAD, stubProc.snapshotOf(id)!!.state)
assertEquals(ErrorClass.MALFORMED, stubProc.snapshotOf(id)!!.errorClass)
fun `watermark stops at a hole so later ids cannot overtake a missing smaller id`() {
val first = inbox.simulateExternalWrite("<MSG/>")
val hole = inbox.simulateExternalWrite("<MSG/>")
val afterHole = inbox.simulateExternalWrite("<MSG/>")
inbox.removeRow(hole)
assertEquals(1, poller.pollOnce(t0))
assertEquals(first, cursor.cursor.committedUpTo)
assertNotNull(cursor.cursor.holeSince)
assertNull(proc.find(afterHole)) // 不得越过空洞入队(FIFO
assertEquals(0, poller.pollOnce(t0.plusSeconds(60))) // 宽限期内水位不推进
assertEquals(first, cursor.cursor.committedUpTo)
}
@Test
fun `an aged hole is released and later ids resume enqueuing`() {
val hole = inbox.simulateExternalWrite("<MSG/>")
val afterHole = inbox.simulateExternalWrite("<MSG/>")
inbox.removeRow(hole)
poller.pollOnce(t0) // 记录空洞观测时刻
val agedOut = t0.plus(props.pipeline.maxCommitDelay)
assertEquals(0, poller.pollOnce(agedOut)) // 空洞判永久:推进水位但不越过入队
assertNull(cursor.cursor.holeSince)
assertEquals(afterHole - 1, cursor.cursor.committedUpTo)
assertEquals(1, poller.pollOnce(agedOut)) // 下一轮恢复发现
assertEquals(afterHole, cursor.cursor.committedUpTo)
assertNotNull(proc.find(afterHole))
}
@Test
fun `compat http path and poller do not double enqueue the same message`() {
val receipt = InboxService(inbox, proc).accept("<MSG/>", t0)
assertEquals(0, poller.pollOnce(t0))
assertEquals(receipt.msgId, cursor.cursor.committedUpTo) // 已在 PG:读取进度照常推进
assertNotNull(proc.find(receipt.msgId))
}
}
@@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
package com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.jobs
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.config.PipelineProps
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.BackfillTodoRepository
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.CminmsgInboxRepository
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubBackfillTodo
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test
import java.time.Duration
import java.time.Instant
/**
* v2 §5ACM2-29 P2-3):提交后回填补偿——失败落库、到期重试、成功即清、退避推后。
* 重启对账语义:待办持久化后,任意时刻新的 sweep 都能继续推进(不依赖内存状态)。
*/
class BackfillSweepJobTest {
private class FakeInbox(var fail: Boolean = false) : CminmsgInboxRepository {
val backfilled = mutableSetOf<Long>()
override fun insertRaw(rawXml: String) = 1L
override fun rawOf(cminmsgsId: Long): String? = null
override fun pollUnprocessed(afterId: Long, limit: Int): List<Long> = emptyList()
override fun backfillOnSuccess(cminmsgsId: Long, sndr: String, type: String, styp: String, seqn: Long) {
if (fail) throw IllegalStateException("mysql-down")
backfilled += cminmsgsId
}
}
private val t0: Instant = Instant.parse("2026-09-08T03:00:00Z")
private fun task(id: Long = 901L) = BackfillTodoRepository.BackfillTask(id, "AODB", "SCHD", "DNLD", 9L)
@Test
fun `due task is retried and removed after successful backfill`() {
val todo = StubBackfillTodo()
val inbox = FakeInbox(fail = false)
todo.record(task(), "mysql-down", t0)
val job = BackfillSweepJob(todo, inbox, PipelineProps())
val outcome = job.sweep(t0.plusSeconds(60))
assertEquals(BackfillSweepJob.SweepOutcome(inspected = 1, succeeded = 1, failed = 0), outcome)
assertEquals(0, todo.count())
assertTrue(901L in inbox.backfilled)
}
@Test
fun `failed retry increments attempts and applies exponential backoff`() {
val todo = StubBackfillTodo()
val inbox = FakeInbox(fail = true)
todo.record(task(), "mysql-down", t0)
val job = BackfillSweepJob(todo, inbox, PipelineProps())
val outcome = job.sweep(t0)
assertEquals(BackfillSweepJob.SweepOutcome(inspected = 1, succeeded = 0, failed = 1), outcome)
assertEquals(1, todo.count())
assertEquals(1, todo.tasks.values.single().attempts)
assertEquals("mysql-down", todo.lastErrorOf(901L))
// 一次失败后 30s 内不再到期(退避生效)
assertEquals(0, todo.findDue(t0.plusSeconds(29)).size)
assertEquals(1, todo.findDue(t0.plusSeconds(30)).size)
}
@Test
fun `recovered inbox completes compensation on a later sweep as if restarted`() {
val todo = StubBackfillTodo()
val inbox = FakeInbox(fail = true)
todo.record(task(), "mysql-down", t0)
val job = BackfillSweepJob(todo, inbox, PipelineProps())
job.sweep(t0)
job.sweep(t0.plusSeconds(30)) // 第二次仍失败 → attempts=2
inbox.fail = false // 共享信箱恢复(模拟重启后对账)
val outcome = job.sweep(t0.plusSeconds(90))
assertEquals(BackfillSweepJob.SweepOutcome(inspected = 1, succeeded = 1, failed = 0), outcome)
assertEquals(0, todo.count())
assertTrue(901L in inbox.backfilled)
}
@Test
fun `backoff delay doubles per attempt and caps at fifteen minutes`() {
assertEquals(Duration.ofSeconds(30), BackfillSweepJob.backoffDelayFor(1))
assertEquals(Duration.ofMinutes(2), BackfillSweepJob.backoffDelayFor(3))
assertEquals(Duration.ofMinutes(15), BackfillSweepJob.backoffDelayFor(10))
assertEquals(Duration.ofMinutes(15), BackfillSweepJob.backoffDelayFor(50))
}
}
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
package com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.processing
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.config.MailboxProps
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.config.PipelineProps
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.ErrorClass
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.ProcStatus
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.CminmsgInboxRepository
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.MailboxRow
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubInbox
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubProcState
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertFalse
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNotNull
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNull
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test
import java.time.Clock
import java.time.Duration
import java.time.Instant
import java.time.ZoneOffset
/**
* 回填通道不变量(docs/message-lifecycle.md §3/§4/§5.2/§11):
* 终态即刻补写、失败退避重试、超期期限 R 覆盖退避、标记单调只写空标、
* 中间态不适用、回填失败不回改终态、重启后扫描不依赖内存状态。
*/
class BackfillServiceTest {
private val t0: Instant = Instant.parse("2026-09-08T03:00:00Z")
private val props = PipelineProps()
/** 可注入故障的信箱:验证回填失败路径(§3 失败处理)。 */
private class FakeMailbox(var fail: Boolean = false) : CminmsgInboxRepository {
val marked = linkedSetOf<Long>()
override fun insertRaw(rawXml: String): Long = 1L
override fun rawOf(msgId: Long): String? = null
override fun readRange(fromExclusive: Long, limit: Int): List<MailboxRow> = emptyList()
override fun maxId(): Long? = null
override fun markProcessedIfUnmarked(msgId: Long, value: String): Boolean {
if (fail) throw IllegalStateException("mysql-down")
return marked.add(msgId)
}
}
private fun service(proc: StubProcState, mailbox: CminmsgInboxRepository, now: Instant = t0) =
BackfillService(proc, mailbox, MailboxProps(), props, Clock.fixed(now, ZoneOffset.UTC))
/** 终态 + 回填意图(固定时刻,避免依赖真实时钟)。 */
private fun succeeded(proc: StubProcState, id: Long) {
proc.insertIfAbsent(id, t0)
proc.markTerminal(id, ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED, now = t0)
}
@Test
fun `terminal message is marked immediately and the intent is cleared`() {
val proc = StubProcState()
val inbox = StubInbox().apply { clear() }
val id = inbox.insertRaw("<MSG/>")
succeeded(proc, id)
service(proc, inbox).attempt(id)
assertEquals("PROCESSED", inbox.markOf(id))
val row = proc.find(id)!!
assertNotNull(row.backfillAt)
assertNull(row.backfillNextAt)
assertNull(row.backfillError)
}
@Test
fun `marking is monotonic - an existing value is never overwritten`() {
val inbox = StubInbox().apply { clear() }
val id = inbox.insertRaw("<MSG/>")
assertTrue(inbox.markProcessedIfUnmarked(id, "PROCESSED"))
assertFalse(inbox.markProcessedIfUnmarked(id, "OTHER")) // §11 只把空标写为已处理
assertEquals("PROCESSED", inbox.markOf(id))
}
@Test
fun `already marked rows are idempotent and never recorded as failures`() {
val proc = StubProcState()
val inbox = StubInbox().apply { clear() }
val id = inbox.insertRaw("<MSG/>")
succeeded(proc, id)
val backfill = service(proc, inbox)
backfill.attempt(id)
backfill.attempt(id) // 重复执行无副作用(§5.2 补写只针对空标记)
assertNull(proc.find(id)!!.backfillError)
assertEquals(0, proc.find(id)!!.backfillAttempts)
}
@Test
fun `failed attempt records backoff and never touches the terminal state`() {
val proc = StubProcState()
val mailbox = FakeMailbox(fail = true)
succeeded(proc, 901L)
service(proc, mailbox).attempt(901L)
val row = proc.find(901L)!!
assertEquals(ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED, row.state) // §11 终态不可逆
assertEquals(1, row.backfillAttempts)
assertEquals("mysql-down", row.backfillError)
assertEquals(t0.plus(Duration.ofSeconds(30)), row.backfillNextAt)
assertNull(row.backfillAt)
}
@Test
fun `sweep retries due rows and completes once the mailbox recovers`() {
val proc = StubProcState()
val mailbox = FakeMailbox(fail = true)
succeeded(proc, 901L)
val backfill = service(proc, mailbox)
assertEquals(1, backfill.sweep(t0)) // 到期 → 失败 → 退避
assertEquals(0, backfill.sweep(t0.plusSeconds(29))) // 未到期
assertEquals(1, backfill.sweep(t0.plusSeconds(30))) // 到期再试 → 仍失败(重启后同样收敛)
mailbox.fail = false
assertEquals(1, backfill.sweep(t0.plusSeconds(90)))
assertTrue(901L in mailbox.marked)
assertNotNull(proc.find(901L)!!.backfillAt)
}
/** §5.2:超期期限 R 覆盖退避,保证库方清除前提「边界内无未标记行」在有限时间内成立。 */
@Test
fun `overdue rows bypass the retry backoff`() {
val proc = StubProcState()
val inbox = StubInbox().apply { clear() }
val id = inbox.insertRaw("<MSG/>")
val old = t0.minus(props.pipeline.overdueBackfill).minusSeconds(60)
proc.insertIfAbsent(id, old) // 接收时间早于 R
proc.markTerminal(id, ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED, now = t0)
proc.recordBackfillFailure(id, "mysql-down", 5, t0.plus(Duration.ofMinutes(15)), t0) // 退避推到很远之后
assertEquals(1, service(proc, inbox).sweep(t0))
assertNotNull(proc.find(id)!!.backfillAt)
}
/** §5.2:中间态(PENDING / FAILED)不适用超期补写——处理未完成时不打标。 */
@Test
fun `mid states are never marked even when far past the deadline`() {
val proc = StubProcState()
val inbox = StubInbox().apply { clear() }
val pending = inbox.insertRaw("<MSG/>")
val failed = inbox.insertRaw("<MSG/>")
val old = t0.minus(props.pipeline.overdueBackfill).minusSeconds(60)
proc.insertIfAbsent(pending, old)
proc.insertIfAbsent(failed, old)
proc.update(failed, ProcStatus.FAILED, errorClass = ErrorClass.INFRA)
assertEquals(0, service(proc, inbox).sweep(t0))
assertFalse(inbox.isMarked(pending))
assertFalse(inbox.isMarked(failed))
}
@Test
fun `backoff delay doubles per attempt and caps at fifteen minutes`() {
assertEquals(Duration.ofSeconds(30), BackfillService.backoffDelayFor(1))
assertEquals(Duration.ofMinutes(2), BackfillService.backoffDelayFor(3))
assertEquals(Duration.ofMinutes(15), BackfillService.backoffDelayFor(10))
assertEquals(Duration.ofMinutes(15), BackfillService.backoffDelayFor(50))
}
}
@@ -13,12 +13,13 @@ import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.ProcStatus
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.Targets
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.flight.FlightState
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.PersistOutcome
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubBackfillTodo
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubProcState
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubFlightState
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubMsgEvents
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubPipelineLock
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubPipelineTx
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNotNull
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test
import java.time.LocalDate
@@ -59,9 +60,10 @@ class FdelAndAdftProcessorTest {
fun `active flight deletion publishes single tombstone and keeps details`() {
val f = flights()
val events = StubMsgEvents()
val todo = StubBackfillTodo()
val proc = StubProcState()
proc.insertIfAbsent(msgId, null)
val result = FdelProcessor(StubPipelineTx(), StubPipelineLock(), f, events, todo, ObjectMapper())
val result = FdelProcessor(StubPipelineTx(), StubPipelineLock(), f, events, proc, ObjectMapper())
.apply(head(), msg(), FlopPayload("121"))
assertEquals(ApplyResult.Succeeded, result)
@@ -71,14 +73,17 @@ class FdelAndAdftProcessorTest {
assertEquals(1, tombstones.size)
assertEquals(Targets.KAFKA_SCHD, tombstones.single().target)
assertTrue(tombstones.single().payloadJson.contains("\"deleted\":true"))
assertEquals(1, todo.count())
// 终态 + 回填意图由处理器在自己的事务内落库(message-lifecycle §2/§4
val row = proc.find(msgId)!!
assertEquals(ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED, row.state)
assertNotNull(row.backfillNextAt)
}
@Test
fun `repeated FDEL is idempotent without version bump or duplicate event`() {
val f = flights()
val events = StubMsgEvents()
val proc = FdelProcessor(StubPipelineTx(), StubPipelineLock(), f, events, null, ObjectMapper())
val proc = FdelProcessor(StubPipelineTx(), StubPipelineLock(), f, events, StubProcState(), ObjectMapper())
proc.apply(head(), msg(), FlopPayload("121"))
val version = f.findMainRow("121")!!.stateVersion
@@ -94,7 +99,7 @@ class FdelAndAdftProcessorTest {
val f = StubFlightState()
val events = StubMsgEvents()
val result = FdelProcessor(StubPipelineTx(), StubPipelineLock(), f, events, null, ObjectMapper())
val result = FdelProcessor(StubPipelineTx(), StubPipelineLock(), f, events, StubProcState(), ObjectMapper())
.apply(head(), msg(), FlopPayload("999"))
assertEquals(ApplyResult.Succeeded, result) // §3.3:迟到/不存在幂等成功
@@ -107,7 +112,7 @@ class FdelAndAdftProcessorTest {
f.markDeleted("121", msgId = 2, now = java.time.Instant.now())
val events = StubMsgEvents()
val adft = AdftProcessor(
StubPipelineTx(), StubPipelineLock(), f, events, null,
StubPipelineTx(), StubPipelineLock(), f, events, StubProcState(),
OperationDayProps().apply { zone = "Asia/Shanghai" }, ObjectMapper(),
)
val record = com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.flight.ScheduleRecord(
@@ -128,7 +133,7 @@ class FdelAndAdftProcessorTest {
val f = StubFlightState()
val events = StubMsgEvents()
val adft = AdftProcessor(
StubPipelineTx(), StubPipelineLock(), f, events, null,
StubPipelineTx(), StubPipelineLock(), f, events, StubProcState(),
OperationDayProps().apply { zone = "Asia/Shanghai" }, ObjectMapper(),
)
@@ -154,7 +159,7 @@ class FdelAndAdftProcessorTest {
msgId = 1, now = java.time.Instant.now(),
)
val adft = AdftProcessor(
StubPipelineTx(), StubPipelineLock(), f, StubMsgEvents(), null,
StubPipelineTx(), StubPipelineLock(), f, StubMsgEvents(), StubProcState(),
OperationDayProps().apply { zone = "Asia/Shanghai" }, ObjectMapper(),
)
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.SnapshotFlag
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.SnapshotResult
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.Targets
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.flight.FlightState
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.BackfillTodoRepository
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.FlightStateRepository
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.MsgEventRepository
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.PersistOutcome
@@ -24,8 +23,8 @@ import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubFlightState
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubMsgEvents
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubProcState
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubSnapshotLog
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.stub.StubBackfillTodo
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNotNull
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNull
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test
@@ -70,7 +69,6 @@ class ScheduleProcessorTest {
flights: StubFlightState = StubFlightState(),
events: StubMsgEvents = StubMsgEvents(),
log: StubSnapshotLog = StubSnapshotLog(),
todo: StubBackfillTodo? = StubBackfillTodo(),
tx: PipelineTransactionManager? = null,
): ScheduleProcessor {
val txRunner = tx ?: object : PipelineTransactionManager {
@@ -83,20 +81,20 @@ class ScheduleProcessorTest {
flightState = flights,
msgEvents = events,
snapshotLog = log,
backfillTodo = todo,
operationDayProps = OperationDayProps().apply { zone = "Asia/Shanghai"; cutoffHour = 0 },
mapper = ObjectMapper(),
)
}
@Test
fun `happy path persists snapshot with version bump, events, snap log and backfill todo`() {
fun `happy path persists snapshot, events, terminal state and backfill intent in one transaction`() {
val proc = StubProcState()
proc.insertIfAbsent(msgId, null)
val flights = StubFlightState()
val events = StubMsgEvents()
val log = StubSnapshotLog()
val todo = StubBackfillTodo()
val result = processor(flights = flights, events = events, log = log, todo = todo)
val result = processor(proc = proc, flights = flights, events = events, log = log)
.applyScheduleRecords(head(), message(makeBody("121" to "15DEC261723")))
assertEquals(ApplyResult.Succeeded, result)
@@ -108,13 +106,17 @@ class ScheduleProcessorTest {
assertEquals(1, log.entries.size)
assertEquals(SnapshotResult.COMMITTED, log.entries.single().result)
assertEquals(1, log.entries.single().upserted)
assertEquals(1, todo.count()) // design.md §3.3/§6.1 事务内预登记
// message-lifecycle §2/§4:终态与回填意图随业务写入在同一事务提交(不依赖主泵补写)
val row = proc.find(msgId)!!
assertEquals(ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED, row.state)
assertNotNull(row.backfillNextAt)
}
@Test
fun `replay of succeeded message records idempotent success without writes`() {
val proc = StubProcState()
proc.insert(msgId, ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED)
proc.insertIfAbsent(msgId, null)
proc.markTerminal(msgId, ProcStatus.SUCCEEDED)
val flights = StubFlightState()
val log = StubSnapshotLog()
@@ -190,17 +192,16 @@ class ScheduleProcessorTest {
val proc = StubProcState()
val flights = StubFlightState()
val log = StubSnapshotLog()
val todo = StubBackfillTodo()
proc.insert(msgId)
val p = processor(proc = proc, flights = flights, log = log, todo = todo, tx = TxRunner { true })
proc.insertIfAbsent(msgId, null)
val p = processor(proc = proc, flights = flights, log = log, tx = TxRunner { true })
// design.md §2.3:数据库/内部故障 → 异常上抛,MessageProcessor 记 FAILED(INFRA) 退避;不写任何终态
org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertThrows(IllegalStateException::class.java) {
p.applyScheduleRecords(head(), message(makeBody("121" to "15DEC261723")))
}
assertNull(flights.findMainRow("121"))
assertEquals(0, todo.count())
assertEquals(0, log.entries.size)
assertEquals(ProcStatus.PENDING, proc.find(msgId)!!.state)
assertNull(proc.find(msgId)!!.backfillNextAt) // 事务回滚:终态与回填意图都不落库
}
}
+11
View File
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
# U07stubs=true 提供内存仓储使全链路(Controller→Inbox→Pump→Dispatcher)可装配;
# autostart=false:测试内不自动拉起后台循环(避免泄漏线程),按需手动 tick。
# ACM2-12main 的 datasources.default(自有 PG)默认 enabled=false,测试以 H2 内存替代并显式启用。
# V2BackfillService 注入 MailboxProps,其 shared-mysql.* 占位符必须在测试环境可解析
# (信箱不启用:enabled=false,仅需占位符取值)。
msgx:
register-eureka: false
stubs: true
@@ -18,6 +20,15 @@ datasources:
password: ""
driver-class-name: org.h2.Driver
mailbox:
processed-value: PROCESSED
shared-mysql:
enabled: false
url: jdbc:mysql://127.0.0.1:3306/cdairport
username: msgx_test
password: msgx_test
driver-class-name: com.mysql.cj.jdbc.Driver
flyway:
datasources:
default: