Files
msgexchange-v2/src/main/kotlin/com/gzzn/omms/msgexchange/processing/Pump.kt
T
windyboy d475feb790 docs(kdoc): 重写信箱生命周期相关 KDoc,改为直白说明并去掉内部编号
原有注释大量引用 §5.1/§5.2/Q2/US-01 这类文档编号和内部简称,跳过了"这段代码在做什么、
为什么这么做",没有读过设计文档的人基本读不懂。本次统一改成先讲清这件事本身、
再说为什么要这样做,编号只在末尾留一处指路。

覆盖本次改动涉及的 24 个 Kotlin 文件(生产 16 个 + 测试 8 个):

- 领域与端口:ProcState(补齐全量字段说明与状态/错误分类逐项注释)、
  ProcStateRepository / InboxCursorRepository / CminmsgInboxRepository 及
  MailboxRow / BackfillDue / Backlog;
- 收报:InboxPoller(把"水位连续、遇缺口停下、缺口老化"用大白话讲透)、
  InboxService、JdbcCminmsgInboxRepository;
- 处理:Pump / MessageProcessor、ScheduleProcessor、DynamicProcessors、
  ProcFailure、JdbcProcStateRepository 与游标实现;
- 回填与观测:BackfillService、InboxLifecycleHealthIndicator、JobRunner;
- 配置与 stub:PipelineProps(三个新增参数说清取值理由)、MailboxProps、
  StubRepositories;
- 测试:8 个测试类改为"这些用例在守哪几条规矩",并保留 H2 不覆盖
  ON CONFLICT 的说明。

术语统一按第一次出现就地解释:水位、处理标记、回填、死信、队头、终态。
纯注释改动;除拆分枚举时按仓库风格补的两个行尾逗号外无代码变更
(已用剥离注释后比对 HEAD 的方式逐文件核对)。测试仍为 78 passed / 1 skipped。
2026-09-10 11:05:55 +08:00

234 lines
11 KiB
Kotlin
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
package com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.processing
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.codec.FlopPayload
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.codec.ScheduleBody
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.codec.XmlCodec
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.config.PipelineProps
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.DecodedMessage
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.ErrorClass
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.MsgKind
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.ProcState
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.domain.ProcStatus
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.log.TraceLog
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.CminmsgInboxRepository
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.persistence.ProcStateRepository
import com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.infra.retry.ProcFailure
import jakarta.inject.Singleton
import java.time.Clock
import java.time.Duration
import java.time.Instant
/**
* 处理主泵:一个线程按消息 ID 从小到大一条条处理,保证先来的先处理。
*
* 每次 tick 只看当前最小的未完成消息("队头"):
* - 没有待处理消息就睡一个轮询间隔;
* - 队头失败了还在退避期,就等到能重试的时刻;如果重试次数用尽或滞留太久,
* 直接转死信,不放任它一直堵着;
* - 其余情况交给 [MessageProcessor] 处理。
*
* 一次只处理一条是刻意的。后面的消息不能越过卡住的队头,否则同一条航班的报文
* 可能被乱序应用,几十秒后才到的旧报文会把新状态覆盖回去。
*/
@Singleton
class Pump(
private val procState: ProcStateRepository,
private val processor: MessageProcessor,
private val backfill: BackfillService,
private val props: PipelineProps,
private val clock: Clock,
) {
private val log = org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getLogger(Pump::class.java)
@Volatile
private var running = true
/** 请求停机:当前 tick 跑完就退出。线程中断由 PipelineLifecycle 负责。 */
fun stop() {
running = false
}
fun loop() {
while (running) {
try {
tick()
} catch (e: InterruptedException) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt()
return
} catch (e: Exception) {
// 兜底:单条消息的失败状态已在 processOne 内记录,这里只避免线程退出
sleepQuietly(props.pipeline.pollInterval)
}
}
}
internal fun tick() {
val head = procState.headUnfinished()
when {
head == null -> sleepQuietly(props.pipeline.pollInterval)
head.state == ProcStatus.FAILED && (head.nextAttemptAt ?: Instant.EPOCH) > clock.instant() ->
if (poisoned(head)) {
log.error("poison -> DEAD msgId={} attempts={} lastError={}", head.msgId, head.attempts, head.lastError)
procState.markTerminal(
head.msgId, ProcStatus.DEAD,
errorClass = ErrorClass.EXHAUSTED,
lastError = head.lastError ?: "head-deadline-exceeded",
attempts = head.attempts,
)
backfill.attempt(head.msgId)
} else {
sleepQuietly(Duration.between(clock.instant(), head.nextAttemptAt))
}
// 其余情况(新消息,或退避到期的重试)交给处理入口
else -> processor.processOne(head)
}
}
private fun poisoned(head: ProcState): Boolean =
head.attempts >= props.pipeline.maxAttempts ||
Duration.between(head.updatedAt, clock.instant()) > props.pipeline.headDeadline
private fun sleepQuietly(d: Duration) {
if (!d.isNegative && !d.isZero) Thread.sleep(d.toMillis().coerceAtLeast(1))
}
}
/**
* 处理一条消息:读原文 → 解码 → 绑定业务身份 → 分派给对应处理器 → 提交后回填标记。
*
* 业务数据和终态由各处理器在自己的事务里写入。终态一旦落下(成功、跳过或死信),
* 这里马上试一次把处理标记写回信箱;写不进去也没关系,回填扫描会按退避继续重试。
*
* 任何意外异常都算在当前这条消息头上(记 FAILED(INFRA) 后重试),不会把主泵线程带崩。
* 报文非法和整包协议拒绝不重试,直接进死信等人工处置。
*/
@Singleton
class MessageProcessor(
private val inbox: CminmsgInboxRepository,
private val procState: ProcStateRepository,
private val codec: XmlCodec,
private val scheduleProcessor: ScheduleProcessor,
private val flopProcessor: FlopProcessor,
private val fdelProcessor: FdelProcessor,
private val adftProcessor: AdftProcessor,
private val procFailure: ProcFailure,
private val backfill: BackfillService,
private val props: PipelineProps,
) {
private val log = org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getLogger(MessageProcessor::class.java)
fun processOne(head: ProcState) {
TraceLog.withTrace(head.msgId) {
val terminal = try {
processInternal(head)
} catch (e: InterruptedException) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt()
throw e
} catch (e: Exception) {
// 边界化:异常归于本条 head,写 FAILED(INFRA)/DEAD,而不是穿出杀 pump
log.warn("processOne unexpected failure msgId={} ec=INFRA msg={}", head.msgId, e.message ?: e.javaClass.simpleName)
procFailure.fail(head, ErrorClass.INFRA, e.message ?: e.javaClass.simpleName)
}
// 终态已提交:立即尝试一次回填;失败留待回填扫描按退避重试(意图已在终态事务内登记)。
// 中间态(PENDING/FAILED)不适用(message-lifecycle §5.2)。
if (terminal) backfill.attempt(head.msgId)
}
}
/** @return 这条消息是否已经落到终态(只有终态才允许回填信箱标记) */
private fun processInternal(head: ProcState): Boolean {
// 守卫:手工/遗留 FAILED 行若 attempts 已达上限,直接终态(防止退避到期后无限重试)
if (head.state == ProcStatus.FAILED && procFailure.scheduler.exhausted(head.attempts)) {
log.error("head exhausted at entry -> DEAD msgId={} attempts={}", head.msgId, head.attempts)
procState.markTerminal(
head.msgId, ProcStatus.DEAD,
errorClass = ErrorClass.EXHAUSTED,
lastError = head.lastError ?: "max-attempts",
attempts = head.attempts,
)
return true
}
val raw = inbox.rawOf(head.msgId)
if (raw == null) {
log.error("raw missing -> DEAD(MALFORMED) msgId={}", head.msgId)
return deadMalformed(head, "raw-missing")
}
val decoded = when (val r = codec.decode(raw)) {
is com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.codec.DecodeResult.Ok -> r.message
is com.gzzn.omms.msgexchange.codec.DecodeResult.Err -> {
// MALFORMED(报文非法)→ DEAD 不重试;CODEC_ERROR(可随 codec 修复重放)→ FAILED 退避
if (r.failure.errorClass == ErrorClass.MALFORMED) {
log.error("decode MALFORMED -> DEAD msgId={} detail={}", head.msgId, r.failure.detail)
return deadMalformed(head, r.failure.detail)
}
log.warn("decode {} -> FAILED msgId={} detail={}", r.failure.errorClass, head.msgId, r.failure.detail)
return procFailure.fail(head, r.failure.errorClass, r.failure.detail)
}
}
// I3identity 仅首次绑定(head.identityKey == null);FAILED 重试不重绑
if (head.identityKey == null) {
val identity = Identity.of(decoded, props.identity)
if (!procState.tryBindIdentity(head.msgId, identity)) {
val owner = procState.ownerOfIdentity(identity) ?: -1L
log.info("duplicate-of:{} -> SKIPPED msgId={}", owner, head.msgId)
procState.markTerminal(head.msgId, ProcStatus.SKIPPED, lastError = "duplicate-of:$owner")
return true
}
}
// 处理器分派:SCHD 日计划主链路(§3.1/ FLOP / FDEL / ADFT;缺载荷按 MALFORMED 终态
val result: ApplyResult = when (val kind = decoded.kind) {
is MsgKind.Schd -> {
val body = decoded.body as? ScheduleBody
if (body == null) return deadMalformed(head, "missing-schd-body")
when (kind.subtype) {
MsgKind.SchdSubtype.DNLD, MsgKind.SchdSubtype.RESP ->
scheduleProcessor.applyScheduleRecords(head, decoded)
MsgKind.SchdSubtype.ADFT -> {
val record = body.records.singleOrNull()
if (record == null) return deadMalformed(head, "adft-needs-single-fltr")
adftProcessor.apply(head, decoded, record)
}
}
}
MsgKind.Fdel -> {
val payload = decoded.body as? FlopPayload
if (payload == null) return deadMalformed(head, "missing-fdel-flid")
fdelProcessor.apply(head, decoded, payload)
}
is MsgKind.Flop -> {
val payload = decoded.body as? FlopPayload
if (payload == null) return deadMalformed(head, "missing-flop-body")
flopProcessor.apply(head, decoded, payload)
}
is MsgKind.Unsupported -> {
// design.md §2.3:未支持类型 → FAILED(UNSUPPORTED) 退避重试,达阈值转 DEAD;绝不写终态
log.warn("unsupported type -> FAILED(UNSUPPORTED) msgId={} tag={}", head.msgId, kind.tag)
return procFailure.fail(head, ErrorClass.UNSUPPORTED, "no-handler:${kind.tag}")
}
}
if (result is ApplyResult.DeadProtocol) {
// design.md §2.3:整包拒绝 DEAD(PROTOCOL),立即释放队头,交人工确认
log.error("DEAD(PROTOCOL) msgId={} reason={} flags={}", head.msgId, result.reason, result.flags)
procState.markTerminal(
head.msgId, ProcStatus.DEAD,
errorClass = ErrorClass.PROTOCOL,
lastError = result.reason.take(1000),
)
return true
}
// Succeeded / ReplaySkippedSUCCEEDED 终态与回填意图已由处理器在自己的事务内落库
log.info("SUCCEEDED msgId={} kind={}", head.msgId, decoded.typeTag)
return true
}
private fun deadMalformed(head: ProcState, detail: String): Boolean {
procState.markTerminal(head.msgId, ProcStatus.DEAD, errorClass = ErrorClass.MALFORMED, lastError = detail)
return true
}
}